Skip to main content

Federal Reserve Regulatory Service Transmittal 424 June 2016

Transmittal Archive

June 2016Transmittal 424 Effective: 6/1/2016
Banks and Banking
Policy Statements
The Board periodically issues Supervision and Regulation (SR) letters announcing that certain previously issued guidance has become inactive or has been superseded.
  • SR letter 16-9, “Inactive Supervisory Guidance,” issued April 21, 2016, affects the following guidance published in the Federal Reserve Regulatory Service:
    • Recent Developments Regarding Loan Loss Allowances (inactive) (Guidance, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses at 3-1482)
    • Joint Interagency Letter on the Loan Loss Allowance (inactive) (Guidance, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses at 3-1483)
    • Interagency Statement on U.S. Implementation of Basel II Advanced Approaches Framework (inactive) (Guidance, Capital at 3-1506.332)
  • SR letter 12-6, “Inactive Supervisory Guidance,” issued April 12, 2012, and revised July 26, 2012, affects the following guidance published in the Federal Reserve Regulatory Service:
    • Interagency Advisory Concerning “Prime Bank” Financial Instruments (inactive) (Guidance, Financial Instruments at 3-1535.5)
    • Interagency Advisory Concerning a “Safe Harbor” and the Filing of Suspicious Activity Reports (superseded) (Bank Secrecy Act Regulations, SAR Safe Harbor at 3-1850)
Proposed Rules
The Board is inviting comment on a proposed rule to promote U.S. financial stability by improving the resolvability and resilience of systemically important U.S. banking organizations and systemically important foreign banking organizations pursuant to section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). More... Under the proposed rule, any U.S. top-tier bank holding company identified by the Board as a global systemically important banking organization (GSIB), the subsidiaries of any U.S. GSIB (other than national banks and federal savings associations), and the U.S. operations of any foreign GSIB (other than national banks and federal savings associations) would be subjected to restrictions regarding the terms of their non-cleared qualified financial contracts (QFCs). First, a covered entity would generally be required to ensure that QFCs to which it is party, including QFCs entered into outside the United States, provide that any default rights and restrictions on the transfer of the QFCs are limited to the same extent as they would be under the Dodd-Frank Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. Second, a covered entity would generally be prohibited from being party to QFCs that would allow a QFC counterparty to exercise default rights against the covered entity based on the entry into a resolution proceeding under the Dodd-Frank Act, Federal Deposit Insurance Act, or any other resolution proceeding of an affiliate of the covered entity. The proposal would also amend certain definitions in the Board’s capital and liquidity rules; these amendments are intended to ensure that the regulatory capital and liquidity treatment of QFCs to which a covered entity is party is not affected by the proposed restrictions on such QFCs. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is expected to issue a proposed rule that would subject national banks and federal savings associations that are GSIB subsidiaries to requirements substantively identical to those proposed here. Comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking must be received by August 5, 2016 (Docket R-1538).

Back to top